Jul 09 2006

Selling online Services

Tag: Raves @ 11:26 am

I’ve been following Ray Deck’s 52 Bicycles blog and recently he posted on a topic too close to my heart for me to ignore - selling online services.

Selling a service online with repeat revenue, even if it is of much lower  per-sale value than say a perpertual license single sale of an online or offline product, is much more appealing to any solution provider.

For one, you have a guaranteed revenue based cashflow (instead of a single-sale customer) assuming that your service is one that your customers would begin to depend upon and worthy enough to capture interest in the first place, of course.

Support, updates and value adds are much more justified and easier to deploy on an online service as well.

Customer interaction is again one-on-one and an excellent way to gather feedback and improve your offering.

Copy-protection / piracy issues are also eliminated from start - since your offering is online and so are your customers, pirates cannot rob you of the revenue that you work so hard for.

All-in-all, an online service model has more potential than other models. What remains to be seen is of course how today’s startup Web 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, etc. ventures figure out a business model that goes beyond the boring “Get advertisement revenue while we wait for Google / Yahoo / Microsoft / eBay to acquire us”


Jul 03 2006

The Slashdot effect?

Tag: Rants @ 3:23 pm

I got a google web alert set titled YouTube killer and it piqued my attention enough, at least to go and check it out.

Turns out it’s a Slashdot post on the amazingly titled eefoof.com. This site is supposed to let people upload videos and has (currently) the unique distinction of being the only one to offer users advertisement revenue when (if?) their video gets popular.

Well, ideaworthy or not, I don’t know, but they sure didn’t anticipate the slashdot effect very well.

The site is, at the time of this post, throwing up a quite ugly error saying it could not connect to it’s mysql database:


My point?

Anticipate the requirement to scale up. Especially when you’re thinking of building a competitor to web applications like YouTube and Google Video.

Update: Looks like they’ve finally gone up again. Now with a notice saying “Notice: We’re currently being dugg and slashdotted (at the same time) — bear with us”

Update #2: Looks like I was wrong about eefoof.com being the only one to offer revenue. revver.com does this as well, that too by dynamically embedding an advertisement at the end of the video. And they say they’re the only one as well! :)


« Previous Page